 |
Streaming What the Bleep Do We Know!? Online.
Product: What the Bleep Do We Know!?
Average customer review: 
Amazon Price: Sale Price Too Low To Display
Click Below To See Amazon Sale Price
Add to cart to see discount price@
Availability: In Stock
Usually ships in 24 Hours
Free Shipping At Amazon
|
Compare Prices on What the Bleep Do We Know!?
This movie is a perfect example of what Nobel Prize Winner Murray Gell-Mann calls “Quantum Flapdoodle”, i.e. an attempt to expend Quantum Theory to serve a metaphysical, even mystical, plan of the world. This is often the result of confusing Quantum Theory with the interpretation of Quantum Theory. The premise of the movie seems to be to indicate that we invent our contain reality through the observation of it. What follows is a lengthy pseudo-scientific explanation of specific elements of Quantum Theory placed in a light that supports a distorted mystical idea.
Buy,Download, Or Stream What the Bleep Do We Know!?! Click Here
One of the first and most glaringly aggravating points about this movie is the editing. Many of the physicists in this movie were filmed for hours explaining Quantum Theory and the mechanics leisurely it, but only take pieces of the footage were worn out of context to produce it seem as if these experts were supporting a mystical world thought, when in fact they almost universally scoff at it. Coupled with that is the fact that many of these “experts” actually have no physics credentials, Quantum or otherwise.
But what about the science, you ask. Unfortunately, the science in this movie is abysmal. First, as mentioned before, they confuse the theory with the interpretation. This is simply because they advocate the “observation is reality” view, which isn’t fragment of the theory. For a theory to be considered science it must be disprovable. Observation creating reality cannot be disproven simply because it would require an observer to validate, which would then invalidate the “theory”. So from the beginning we have a base basis for science.
Buy,Download, Or Stream What the Bleep Do We Know!?! Click Here
Following that, the movie then cites its “proof”, which is also scientifically invalid. The first was the favorite sage that when Columbus arrived in North America that the natives could peep “the ripples in the water” but couldn’t sight the ships. Nowhere in the movie does it situation that this is a account… its actually presented as literal fact (though I should effect it isn’t implicitly stated in the film that this is a fact, it is certainly implied) . This example fails to own up to scientific standards for various reasons. First, its hearsay. There aren’t any written records or verifiable evidence supporting the myth. Its a record, pure and simple, and as such proves nothing. Second, it fails entertain the more logical reasons, such as the ripples appearing in the water before the ships had actually arrived, a distinctly logical conclusion.
The second example illustrated the “Maharisi Attain”. For those unusual with the experiment, in 1993 four-thousand people practiced trancsendental meditation in an attempt to lower the crime rate in Washington DC. After the “experiment”, the data was analyzed, tweaked and otherwise manipulated to pronounce, amazingly, that violent crime was down 18% (though the film claims 25) . This was viewed as proof of the power of group meditation and sure thinking. Sadly, this example also fails to satisfy the rigorous criteria of science. First, there was no control group, and as such no scheme of brilliant what the crime rate would have been without the meditation. This implies that the lowered crime rate could be the result of several, unrelated factors. Also, the crime rate was only 18% lower than what was predicted by analysis of previous criminal trends in the region. Violent crime increased from the previous year, unprejudiced not as remarkable as was expected by experts. Second, the slay rate during this time actually increased, so while violent crime as a whole increased less than was predicted, more murders were being commited during this time than were predicted. Thirdly, the panel who reviewed the data created by this experiment were followers of the Maharisi and could not be counted as fair, non-biased observers.
The third portion of “proof” supplied is Dr. Emoto’s famed Water Tests in which he tapes words to containers of water and freezes them into crystals that, supposedly, compose pretty images when nice words like “appreciate” and “thank you” are taped to them and putrid, homely images when mean words like “I disfavor you” and “I want to destroy you” are passe. These words were tried in several languages and sometimes images are worn as well. Unfortunately, Dr. Emoto’s astounding work has never been independently recreated in a scientific setting. In fact, the James Randi Educational Foundation has offered a $1,000,000 prize to Dr. Emoto if his data can pass a double blind test, a prize which he has refused to even attempt to claim.
After this there is a long discussion about cellular peptides and how these are responsible for all observation, emotion and, in essence, reality. This was the only section of the movie that had some sound basis in reality and could be backed up with science. It is 100% factual that the chemical processes in our brains can vastly enact how we plan reality, which is the basis of psychiatric pharmocology. The movie then moves on to utilize this as proof of the power of distinct thinking, i.e. “Our brains control how we belief reality so we don’t need mind-altering medications to be overjoyed!” Yay! Except when there’s something unsuitable with our brain and those chemicals are out of balance. I’d like to watch somebody reveal Charles Manson that all his insanity could be cured by the power of distinct thinking!
The final straw that breaks this movie’s proverbial serve is the inclusion of Ramtha, the 35,000 year customary Atlantian warrior spirit brought to us courtesy of a Tacoma housewife named JZ Knight (his “channel” in Unusual Age circles) . In a thick, Hollywood-esque Eastern European accent, Ramtha tells us about the wonders of Quantum Physics and how it is the first science to even arrive conclude to explaining magic and miracles. Okay… I don’t even know where to launch with this. First of all, if this is a movie about science, why are they including the claims of a Original Age cult leader who can’t be verified one method or another. Also, what are this person’s credentials. If its fair JZ Knight pretending to be some dilapidated Atlantian, does she have a Quantum Physics background? Second, if she IS some extinct Atlantian warrior, what are HIS Quantum Physics credentials (which could be easily verified with a series of Doctorate level tests)?
Of course, her/his authority is never questioned, and there’s a reason. It took a itsy-bitsy digging to acquire, but the gigantic majority of the people interested in making this film are followers of Ramtha. When this came to light, I was flabbergasted. The fact that most of the movies views tumble factual in line with her group’s Recent Age philosophy puts an entirely novel stagger on the movie. Suddenly this looks like nothing but one, vast recruitment share for Ramtha.
I gave this movie one star because it does one salubrious thing: It gets people thinking about Quantum Physics and reality. Some people who spy this movie might be enthusiastic to dig deeper into the sincere science and check out John Gribbin’s profitable series of books about Quantum Physics for the layman. I recommend “In Search of Schrondinger’s Cat” most highly.
As Richard Feynman said, “If you consider you understand quantum mechanics, you don’t understand quantum mechanics”, and that sums up the major jam with this movie. It provides a belief of quantum mechanics that is absurdly simple and abysmally unscientific. The beauty of particle physics is magical in and of itself, it doesn’t need to be married to philosophy and Unique Age metaphysics to be unbelievable.
I humbly submit that truly open-minded persons ought to earn mighty spend of that laudable trait in educating themselves about this movie: the topics it purports to deal with, the manner in which it attempts to report them, & the possible motives & intentions of its makers. Also assume with an commence mind the plan that until one has attained an view of the topics enthusiastic, the objective thing to do is to reserve one’s judgement, especially effusive unearned praise. And finally, try on for size the precept that it’s pretty to initiate out with an initiate mind but not quite so desireable to slay up with one.
Below, for the open-minded, are some suggestions for further reading, grouped by topic. (If the filmmakers had really been very concerned about educating people about these issues, wouldn’t they have leapt to provide this information themselves? )
Overview of the movie:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_the_bleep
Analysis of the movie:
http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/archives/2004/04-10-01.html
http://salon.com/ent/feature/2004/09/16/bleep/index_np.html
http://nthposition.com/whatthebleepdowe.php
Introduction to the seek of quantum mechanics:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics
Introduction to the variety of interpretations of the formalisms of quantum mechanics:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpretations_of_quantum_mechanics
Followed by ‘Quantum Quackery’ (deals with Amit Goswami) :
http://www.csicop.org/si/9701/quantum-quackery.html
Introduction to issues in the philosophy of science (attempting to understand what science is really all about) :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_science
With respect to the filmmakers’ disingenuous & unethical utilize of David Albert:
http://www.thestranger.com/blog/archives/2006/02/05-11.php#a004212
Information about Masaru Emoto & his dubious claims about water crystals:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masaru_Emoto
More about this Ramtha cult:
http://www.rickross.com/groups/ramtha.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramtha
If you’re really eager in exploring an at least more objective attempt to interpret consciousness as having something to do fundamentally with quantum mechnics, stare into Stuart Hameroff’s work:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuart_Hameroff
Film aesthetics, or why this film, aside from its misapprehensions & dishonesties, is an eyesore & annoyance:
See any film by Luis Buñuel or Andrei Tarkovsky or Jan Svankmajer, unbiased for instance. Or if you particularly like not-too-deep but pleasantly engrossing philosophical meandering in film, *Waking Life* & I Heart Huckabees* at least expose agreeable artistry.
Electronic Smokeless Cigarettes
Wedding Album Design
Raise Your Credit Score
Wholesale Authentic Designer Handbags
Electronic Smokeless Cigarette
