LG 55LH40 Compare, Reviews, Discounts

November 15th, 2009 by evelyn6780872
LG 55LH40

Product: LG 55LH40

List Price: $2,199.95
Average customer review:

Amazon Price: Too low to display
Click Here To See Amazon Sale Price

Add to cart to see low price@CHAADPRODUCTTILE

Availability: In Stock
Usually ships in 24 Hours
Free Shipping Available

Compare Prices on LG 55LH40


I nearly pulled the trigger on a Samsung 55″ model but while chasing the cheapest price, ran across this LG at Best Buy for $1799. Detailed info is hard to find, but it was available for store pickup so I took a chance without seeing it first since I could return it easily. I am glad I did. I cannot imagine a better picture. Observations:

Container is 56-1/2″ x 40″ x 21″ with 2 hand holds on each end. Two adult males handled it without much difficulty. Comes with stand attached. Clip the bands, lift the bottomless box up and put it where you want it. I did not, but plan on 3 people to wall mount it.

You are not going to get home theater audio out of any unit without a subwoofer. It is simple physics. This one sounds pretty good for what it is. You can easily connect it to a home theater system with the Digital Audio Out or RCA ports. It has no separate Subwoofer Out port.

I read an article that expounded on the limitations of the human eye to distinguish contrast at any one light level. Think of waiting for your eyes to adjust to bright or dark conditions. The point made is that contrast specs are BS. Test eqpt might measure another TV as having more range than this one, but I don’t think your eyes would detect a difference. This TV has good black levels and maintains them as you crank up the brightness. I still think plasma has the best picture but can’t live with its shortcomings. I question the benefit of LCD LED backlight beyond reduced energy consumption and a skinnier unit. Maybe it improves black levels?

If you have digital cable as a primary source, don’t blame muddy dark areas on a TV. It is just excessive compression they use to save bandwidth. Sat TV is generally better. OTA broadcast is beautiful. Everything falls short of 1080P DVD. A gamma adjustment can help tweak this problem. This TV has some “expert adjustments” including gamma and black level. I haven’t played with them, yet.

One of the imaging engineers I work with gave me a chart that shows the limitations of the human eye with respect to HD. Per the chart, you have to get a lot closer than normal viewing distances to see the difference between 480, 720, or 1080 resolution. This TV is big enough that it might matter to some folks and it looks great up close. I start to see the screen door effect at about a 24″ viewing distance. Even with eagle eyes you would not see it at a comfortable viewing distance.

SD content looks very good but you can’t make it HD. The interpolation algorithms work well. NTSC (the old analog standard, what you get from a VCR) is 320 x 240. Standard DVD is 480P. This is an area where you could see big differences between products.

TV’s are moving toward becoming personal computers. I can see future units having a PDA for a remote and full capabilities. That will be cool. I can’t wait. This one doesn’t have any of that except a USB port for displaying pictures and playing music. It appears that computer capability is what makes a big difference in price. In my opinion, the most capable units are still pretty lame. This is the bottom of the line model but the only difference is the computer features. This TV has a PC port. Online streaming content is 480P, at best, and extremely compressed. I don’t think it looks good on a big screen.

Menus are well designed. This TV makes it easy to optimize to your preferences. I did not like the “Auto” setting for picture brightness. I wanted it brighter. Otherwise, the initial setup wizard did the job.

No S-video. Seems like it is being dropped by the manufacturers.

I would like to have 2 antenna inputs but the only TV I found that has two is Mitsubishi.

Since broadcast frame rates are around 30 fps and interlaced only refreshes half of the lines, I think the effectiveness of 120hz (240hz)refresh rate is pretty subjective and content specific. Same goes for the 24 fps movie source stuff on DVD. This TV has settings for these features. If I find them useful, I will update this review.

I could gush awhile, but I think I will watch the TV instead. When you read other reviews that gush, apply them to this one.

Thanks to all of you who share your opinions and experiences with us. It helps a lot. For TV, even visiting a store will not help much because they do not optimize the picture and the store lighting is usually green. So the brightest one tends to draw your eye.

I bought this because of the great price on Amazon. I was going to wait until Christmas and get the best price on a large 52+ inch LCD or plasma but saw this model on sale at Worst Buy for just under @1500. Checked Amazon and they had it for $1418.19 and thought with free shipping and no sales tax, I was getting it for a super bargain.

I was concerned about some consumer reviews I read. They all said the picture quality was fantastic, but there was a problem with the sync on the sound. I already had sound system hooked directly from my Comcast Digital Cable box so the sound sync problem never was an issue. In playing with the TV, I did try the speakers to hear how good they were and I wasn’t very impressed. There is a sync problem when using the internal speakers so I just turned them off and will forever use my sounds system and get great sound.

The picture quality is really great. I was watching a few of our favorite shows on the first night we had it, and I noticed how much more detail I could notice with this TV. My old LCD was a Sharp 46 inch and while the picture was fantastic too, the detail level that this 55 inch provides is so much better.

Shipping was free and very fast. The item shipped from Phoenix and took a total of 7 days (ordered on Sat and delivered on Friday to be in my home.

Just a quick follow up. I have seen that the price on this TV has dropped…..but I also have noticed that the availability of this item is also very scarce. When you factor in free shipping and no sales tax, the price I paid wasn’t bad at all. Also, the home delivery and set up is a great value.

I am very happy with this purchase. The low price and free shipping made this deal a super value! The only negative I can point to is the sound quality of the internal speakers and the sync problem. I read on another forum that they were able to overcome this with composite cables but I wanted the advantage of HDMI cables.

Overall, super TV image, super seller, and outstanding quality for the money!

I have had this TV for a few weeks now. Actually it is my second. The first one delivered came with the backlight not working correctly. It would turn on/off flicker all the time.

I called Amazon and got referred to LG customer service. LG customer service after going through an unsuccessful over the phone troubleshoot attempt opened a case for repair. Called Amazon back, gave the LG case number, and got the TV promptly replaced (old one picked up when the new one was delivered).

The new TV works great with standard and HD programing (cable), up-scaled DVD and Blue Ray content. Media PC output- connected via HDMI is equally crisp and clear. Controls are simple and intuitive, would definitely buy again.

Amazon service including customer service was outstanding, easy to reach and very helpful (native English speaking support – NOT some difficult to understand, outsourced service)!!

Coby TF-DVD1021 Best Price, Reviews, Compare

November 14th, 2009 by evelyn6780872
Coby TF-DVD1021

Product: Coby TF-DVD1021

List Price: $154.99
Average customer review:

Amazon Price: Too low to display
Click Here To See Amazon Sale Price

Add to cart to see low price@CHAADPRODUCTTILE

Availability: In Stock
Usually ships in 24 Hours
Free Shipping Available

Compare Prices on Coby TF-DVD1021


I must admit I have never been a big fan of Coby and other off/budget brand gear. I tend to buy only Panasonic, Sony and other name brand video gear. I bought this for a road trip for my 5 year old, to try to make my hours of driving on vacation more bearable for him.

I selected it after comparing it with about 6 or 7 other players. Very quickly, I came to the conclusion that any player with a smaller than 8″ screen would not be worth considering. I also found that there are not many name brand players available to choose from. It is best to bring a high quality DVD with you to compare the players one by one. Cars, Happy Feet, Toy Story or other recent animation gives you a pretty good idea how good the picture quality is on each player. Some of the players in the store, when I got there, were playing old Hello Kitty stuff that made all the players look fuzzy and terrible.

After spending about 8 hours with this player this weekend, here are my perceptions.

The good:

The 10″ screen, besides being a very nice size, has an excellent picture quality with its 480 x 800 resolution, vs WQVGA 480 x 234 on many models.

The player came with no dead pixels on the screen, which is always nice. The screen is also matte (anti-reflective), meaning no glare in the car.

It comes with a nice remote that controls all the functions except the volume control, (it is also the only way to control the player when you use the headrest mount).

It includes a complete set of accessories (see list below).

The screen swivels and can be laid flat like a tablet, rare in a budget player.

The speakers are more than acceptable for car use, even with some road noise.

The anti-skip feature works very well, no skipping observed while driving on some rough roads and various on- and off-ramps.

The unit has a video-in port to connect cameras, video games etc.

Two headset ports (both controlled with one volume control).

The battery is built in, making the player thin (1″) and light and is replaceable via a battery door on the bottom of the unit.

The bad:

The two headphones are mostly for kids, since they are rather small.

The battery life is on the short side, rated at around 2 hours (not tested), probably due to the built in design.

If you use the headrest mount, changing DVD’s is a bit of a chore.

The typical warranty on this player and most portable DVD players is 1 year parts, but only 90 days labor. If they break after 90 days, repairing them in most cases will probably not be worth it. The batteries are also in many cases not replaceable, although this player has a battery port access door.

Problems noted:

This player (for unknown reasons) does not care for my Pixar Cars DVD. The audio will skip continuously the first time you start the movie. If you go to the MENU and then return to the movie, everything is fine. Did not see any problems on the 4 or 5 other DVD’s I tried. This DVD is new and scratch free, and has no problems on any of my other DVD players.

The details:

The player has a 10″ screen with 800 x 480 resolution, far higher than most other players that have smaller screens and WQVGA 480 x 234 resolution. The screen brightness and contrast are excellent, and are adjustable from the remote. The WQVGA screens I saw on other players looked pretty bad, even a few feet away. Even with the smaller screens, they were just barely, or not acceptable in my opinion. The credits at the end of movies look especially chopped up, almost unreadable. The viewing angle on this player, and most other typical portable DVD players, is rather narrow, maybe 30-40 degrees. This will make it a bit tricky for other passengers to see the movie using the headrest mount. This appears to be a common limitation on many LCD screens I have encountered on various devices.

The accessory list included is pretty complete: two headsets, car charger, wall charger, video out cable (for playing on an external screen, the Hotel TV for example), cassette adapter to play the movie through the car stereo (assuming you have the rapidly disappearing cassette player), and a headrest adapter. The car charger can be used to power the player continuously in certain airplanes (American Airlines planes for example), and in your car. I mostly intend on using this as a car player (and mostly fly AA), making the battery life for me mostly a moot point.

The headrest mount works well and holds the player securely. It is much more comfortable for your kids than holding the player in their lap, and prevents it from being dropped on the floor in case of tired fingers, car braking, dozing off etc. It can be mounted on headrests and airplane seat tray tables rather easily by adjusting two clip-together straps. This player and most portable DVD players are rather delicate equipment, and probably won’t survive being dropped more than once or twice, making the mount pretty useful.

Changing DVD’s while using the headrest mount is a bit tricky. The mount is a bag type mount the player slides into on one side, closed by a velcro strap. While inside, the DVD is between the screen and the player, which means not accessible. To change the DVD, you have to take the player off the headrest, remove it out of the mount, unlatch the screen to get to the DVD compartment, swap out the DVD, re-insert player into the mount, re-mount the player on the headrest. Mine was mounted on the passenger side headrest, so leaving the mount on the headrest was not possible. It might be possible to slide it out of the headrest if mounted on the drivers side (not attempted by myself).

Here are some of the players I compared before buying this one:

Sony DVPFX810 – a contender but with a smaller 8″ screen, low resolution and a great potential for glare with its shiny plastic window.

Audiovox D1917 – With a 9″ screen, probably an ok kids player due to it being rather inexpensive with a relatively large screen for the price. Picture quality appeared to be ok, but the QWVGA resolution is again barely acceptable.

Memorex® MVDP1102 – With a 10.2″ screen, could have been a contender but the screen was very dark on the player I looked at. I could not find a brightness adjustment anywhere to see if it could be corrected. Could have been just this player, but it was ruled out because the screen was too dark (an obvious factor for daytime use in a car).

Maxx Digital PDV8500 – With a 8.5″ screen, the picture on this player was excellent, the sound was good, appeared to have the best picture of players with 8″ – 9″ screens. It is also a flat player (not clamshell type), so it probably can be mounted easily on a seat or headrest. The plastic construction appeared somewhat fragile however.

Wanted but not found:

Panasonic DVD-LS850 or LS-82. Probably my first choice sight unseen if I would have found one, and if I was choosing this for myself. Excellent battery life of up to 10 hours (LS-82). I have always been a fan of Panasonic video gear and would probably have chosen this player as my #1 choice. If the Coby ever croaks, this will probably be its replacement. I did not see this player in any of the stores I checked. Has gotten very good reviews everywhere I checked.

Not considered:

Accurian(tm) 10″ LMD-5108A – The Accurian players appear to have a bad reputation and appear to die prematurely according to the users posting on the Radioshack website. I therefore did not consider them a viable choice in my search.

Conclusion:

My conclusion here is that in the budget brand portable DVD arena, the Coby might be getting a bad rap, and is by far the best budget 10″ player I have found. I was not expecting much, but was actually very pleasantly surprised that the picture quality of this player was as good as it is. It will be an obvious choice compared next to most lower resolution/smaller screen players. That it can be headrest mounted (although the DVD swapping is a hassle) makes this a good kids DVD player for car travel. Considering that most younger kids prefer watching the same movie over and over, it appears to be a pretty good choice. To overcome the DVD changing issue, I’ll probably use my DVD recorder to make a 6.5 hour cartoon/kids show collection DVD. That should easily cover a day’s worth of vacation driving. My son likes it and can operate the remote on his own, so I have no complaints so far. If picture quality and screen size are important to you, and you are shopping for a budget brand player, I would definitely put this player on my list.

I ordered this Portable DVD after doing some research. I wanted it for work and also for roadtrips with my family.

The sound was good, it didn’t skip when moved around. That was aboutall the positives I give this. The screen is not clear, a bit on the fuzzy side, the headphones that come with this are a joke, you can hear all sorts of background noise. The stop function promised to keep you place in the movie, but it never did. HOWEVER, the biggest problem was that you can hear the DVD spinning in the case while you are watching a movie.

I really can’t recommend this because it is an inferior product. Lot’s of promises from the manufacturer but in all a disappointing product.

I have to agree with Georgie Girl – you can hear the DVD spinning

while you are watching a movie. It makes a constant chirping noise.

You might be able to stand it if you keep the volume on medium,

and the movie has a lot of music. I’d recommend the Initial

IDM-1295 instead. I got it for $170.00 from B&H Photo, and both

the sound and picture are great!

Tiffen 67mm Circular Polarizer Discount

November 10th, 2009 by evelyn6780872
Tiffen 67mm Circular Polarizer

Product: Tiffen 67mm Circular Polarizer

List Price: $104.00
Average customer review:

Amazon Price: Too low to display
Add to cart to see low price@CHAADPRODUCTTILE

Availability: In Stock
Usually ships in 24 Hours
Free Shipping Available

Compare Prices on Tiffen 67mm Circular Polarizer


If you have an autofocus camera and shoot photos outdoors, this filter needs to be attached to the slay of your lens. (If you have a manual focus camera you need a linear polarizer) The polarizer darkens blue skies (if the sky is light blue, you collect deep, rich blue) and eleminates glare and reflection in glass and water.

With this filter, you can consume a photo of someone standing in front of a window and not have the glare or reflection of the window shooting help into the lens. It also helps you shoot indoors at an aquarium (you can pick crystal-clear photos of the killer whales and dolphins without glare from the glass) .

This filter can’t acquire the photos for you, but it can design your photos peruse distinguished more professional. The only thing to be careful of is the fact that the polarizer makes the image a diminutive darker, so if you are shooting in murky light, you need a flash or a slower shutter bustle.

This item is either not coated or has a single coating and thus any time sun hits the filter, it produces flare in the record. Furthermore, after doing more research it turns out that these uncoated or single coated filters can cause up to 9% light loss vs multi-coated filters like Hoya S-HMC or B+W MRC filters. As for polarizer accomplish itself, I contemplate it’s improbable and you owe it to yourself to at least try it on a nice sunny day. (the sky and foliage will perceive completely different and alive)

70INX70IN Model B Manual Screen Wall/ceiling Matte White Discount

November 9th, 2009 by evelyn6780872
70INX70IN Model B Manual Screen Wall/ceiling Matte White

Product: 70INX70IN Model B Manual Screen Wall/ceiling Matte White

List Price: $100.00
Average customer review:

Amazon Price: Too low to display
Add to cart to see low price@CHAADPRODUCTTILE

Availability: In Stock
Usually ships in 24 Hours
Free Shipping Available

Compare Prices on 70INX70IN Model B Manual Screen Wall/ceiling Matte White


this screen came in a long box, ready to be opened and installed on the wall. It is easy to use and does exactly as the discription said it would. One thing I wasn’t sure of when I ordered it. It comes with two screw holes in the frame itself so it can be mounted flush with the wall, or you can use a mounting bracket to mount it away from the wall. Either way, it works wonderful and gives a perfect place to show movies.

the projector screen is very nice, except it doesn’t come with any mounting materials. I have to buy my own mounting brackets.

Canon PowerShot SD1200IS 10 MP Digital Camera with 3x Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 2.5-inch LCD (Dark Gray) Sale

November 9th, 2009 by evelyn6780872
Canon PowerShot SD1200IS 10 MP Digital Camera with 3x Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 2.5-inch LCD (Dark Gray)

Product: Canon PowerShot SD1200IS 10 MP Digital Camera with 3x Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 2.5-inch LCD (Dark Gray)

List Price: No List Price Available
Average customer review:

Amazon Price: Too low to display
Add to cart to see low price@CHAADPRODUCTTILE

Availability: In Stock
Usually ships in 24 Hours
Free Shipping Available

Compare Prices on Canon PowerShot SD1200IS 10 MP Digital Camera with 3x Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 2.5-inch LCD (Dark Gray)


The SD1200 has some big changes over its predecessor SD1100, and is the smallest, best designed Elph I’ve used thus far.

I’ve owned many models of Elph, this is my 6th or 7th, so my review is aimed especially at other serial Canon owners. I mostly compare the SD1200 to the SD1100.

* The big changes: Digic4 and a larger CCD sensor. The slight increase in CCD size (1/2.3″ vs 1/2.5″) should make for “cleaner” photos. And Digic4 promises faster/cleaner shots also.

* You get 10MP vs 8MP on the SD1100, and “medium” (M1) size is now 6MP. JPG quality is down to 2 setting: Fine or Normal.

* SD1200 is only slightly smaller than the SD1100, but feels notably smaller by virtue of curved edges and the LCD being flush with the body (no bump-out).

* The 1200 now feels as small as this design can shrink. Good news: my average-sized male hands can still comfortably hold it, barely not covering lens, flash, or resting on the LCD. But the round power-button is now almost too small to press if you had big fingers and no fingernails.

* 1200’s new battery is a higher capacity 1000mAh (vs ~760mAh for SD1100). There’s also a new charger (not compatible with the old batteries), a glossy white-colored model to blend into your wall.

* The buttons and menus are streamlined. There’s now a button for review mode, pressing it a 2nd time takes you back to the previous state. Handy. The slider has dedicated AUTO and Manual settings, no longer need to use menus for that switch.

* Continuous mode and ISO now are in the Function Menu (on the SD1100, they had dedicated buttons).

* A SD card is no longer included. This makes sense to me, a 32MB card is barely useful, and with the downward pressure on electronics prices, I can’t imagine Canon wanting to bundle a more expensive/bigger card. Some people will find this lack annoying.

* The A/V output is gone, and the USB connector now serves both purposes (both kinds of included cables now have a USB-end)

* A new version of Canon software is required for this model, Zoombrowser 6.3. Canon typically requires a new release for each new family/season of cameras. Unfortunately, the CameraWindow software has been intentionally dumbed-down in the 6.x software and no longer offers the options to delete your photos (have to go through the OS), nor to chose custom naming for the downloads. I say intentionally, since I asked Canon customer-support about it and they stated the changes were not bugs. The last Canon software to still have that functionality was 5.x, corresponding to the SD1000 and other cameras released that season.

* In casual indoor tests, the 1200 seemed more ready to go to ISO400 (often too “noisy” to be useful) when the SD1100 would have chosen ISO200.

* The SD1200 and SD1100 have identical specs on their optics. However, I noticed a more pronounced barrel-distortion on the 1200 at extreme wide-angle. (still only noticable in close-up shots of straight-edged items at wide-angle)

* In a casual speed test, the SD1200 took/stored photos notably faster the SD1100 (same scene, continuous-mode, same brand SD card), despite the 1200’s image size being larger.

* Canon’s paper manuals have been shrinking steadily. With this model, the only manual included is a quick-start guide, the rest is on CD-ROM.

* The packaging is even more efficient than before, about half the size of the SD1100’s box.

* Sadly, there is no HD video mode, although all of the other Elphs released this spring had HD. SD1200 owners are stuck with 640×480 video.

Canon has several sub-series within the compact Elph line, varying mostly by asthetics and optics. The SD1200 is successor to the series that included the SD1100, SD1000, and SD600. These all favor a classic, slim design. If you’re unfamiliar with Canon’s Powershot cameras, there’s lots of good material out there on camera sites such as dpreview.

In general, the small sensors and optics in all ultra-compact digital cameras lead to some optical quirks (such as barrelling), chromatic aberrations, over/under-exposure in bright sunlight/shade, and underpowered flashes. That’s intrinsic to the size of camera, and vendors try to correct these effects in their on-board processing. My opinion is that Canon does a good job of correcting for these issues and the Elphs including the SD1200 take very good photos for their size.

It’s questionable that a SD1100 owner would specifically find this a compelling upgrade other than the Digic4, but this is an excellent compact camera in all ways. Apart from the noteworthy quirks: the lack of HD and the limited features in the download software, this camera is Highly Recommended.

I bought the SD110 (3.2MP) back in 2004 and decided it was time to upgrade this year as it was showing some age. The latest version of that same line is the SD1200. I have had it for a few weeks now and have a few observations. The SD1200 is much faster from the time you turn it on until it is ready to shoot as compared to the SD110. Next, the screen is far better than the one on the SD110. Very bright and readable even in sunlight. The camera itself is smaller than the SD110 as you might expect but does feel a little cheaper. So far I have taken the SD1200 to three main events. A birthday party, K-4 graduation, backyard play time. The birthday part pictures did not turn out well in automatic mode. We were indoors (Pump-it-up) and the lighting was probably not the best. The images were blurry for the most part. I had the same issue at the second event (K-4 graduation) but this time I switched to manual mode and used the “indoor” setting. This greatly improved the picture. Finally, the outdoor shots turned out looking wonderful in automatic mode. With the SD110 the automatic mode was always better than any of the manual settings. It seems with the SD1200 that is not the case. I will continue to explore the settings/features of the camera. I was expecting the SD1200 to be far superior to my 5 year old SD110 but so far the pictures themselves have not turned out markedly better.

B + W 77mm #110 3.0 (1000x) Neutral Density Glass Filter. Sale

November 9th, 2009 by evelyn6780872
B + W 77mm #110 3.0 (1000x) Neutral Density Glass Filter.

Product: B + W 77mm #110 3.0 (1000x) Neutral Density Glass Filter.

List Price: $183.00
Average customer review:

Amazon Price: Too low to display
Add to cart to see low price@CHAADPRODUCTTILE

Availability: In Stock
Usually ships in 24 Hours
Free Shipping Available

Compare Prices on B + W 77mm #110 3.0 (1000x) Neutral Density Glass Filter.


High quality product. Long exposures come out better than expected. Being a 10-stop ND, you have to compose and focus prior to putting this filter on. But that’s not unexpected being so dark. [...].

I’ve been able to keep the shutter open for 30 seconds in bright desert sunlight using this filter (in addition to a small aperture). The lens is made of high quality materials and very sturdy.

Davis & Sanford TRAILBLAZRV Trailblazer Monopod Discount

November 8th, 2009 by evelyn6780872
Davis & Sanford TRAILBLAZRV Trailblazer Monopod

Product: Davis & Sanford TRAILBLAZRV Trailblazer Monopod

List Price: $24.95
Average customer review:

Amazon Price: Too low to display
Add to cart to see low price@CHAADPRODUCTTILE

Availability: In Stock
Usually ships in 24 Hours
Free Shipping Available

Compare Prices on Davis & Sanford TRAILBLAZRV Trailblazer Monopod


Light enough for hiking and tall enough for my 6′5″ friend that loves to borrow my equipment. Built solid, and for the price, a must have for any serious outdoor photographer. Great footing for indoor and outdoor photos. Bought this together with the Davis & Sanford Voyager3H tripod. What a great match! Perfect for my Canon 50D DSLR.

Lightweight and easy to use. Foot has a point for outside but the point can be retracted to save the inside floors.

Download Wild Things Movie

November 7th, 2009 by evelyn6780872

Download Wild Things Movie

Download Wild Things Movie

Download & Watch Wild Things at Amazon.com.

Click Here Now to Download & Watch Wild Things Online Now!

Anyone thinking the unrated version is going to have extended motel or pool scenes will be sorely disappointed in this “unrated” version. I think there was maybe one extra scene. The difference in the two can be summed up using an expression of Adam Sandler’s, “Big Whoppedee Do”.

So if you have the “R” version already, save your $10 bucks.

UPDATE. Well this little gem has popped up on Blu Ray Wild Things (Unrated Edition) [Blu-ray] and those of us that bought it have the dilemma of whether or not to take the plunge and buy it again. I for one, am because its a great movie. Unfortunately, as with the earlier DVDs there are no extras. So now I own 3, yes 3 different DVD versions of the same movie. Oh, and I bought the soundtrack years ago too. LOL

I was one of the few people who actually saw this in a theatre. One of the most pleasant surprizes I’ve had, it’s rare to walk into a movie that completely exceeds you expectations. If you haven’t seen this before, you would do yourself a favor by NOT trying to find out much about the plot before you go in. You only need to know that 1)There’s some gratuitous nudity, 2)It is more complex than it appears to be, and 3)Bill Murray will once again steal a movie with only a handful of lines.

The “Unrated version” didn’t have a whole lot of extra skin, (undercutting the main marketing point for this release). However it did integrate several additional scenes that were available as “extras” in the original edition. It’s nice to have them weaved into the movie rather than hunting them down after the fact trying to think of how they’d fit in. My favorite is the post legal battle lunch between Bill Murray and Robert Wagner; great lines, fun situation, and played perfectly.

Wildthings stands up pretty well to repeated viewings, I’ve watched my old copy probably twice a year since I bought it. It is a modern tight, complex thriller that doesn’t have a dopey sticking point or obvious logic gap in how it fits together. How many times have you watched the latest and greatest hollywood thriller only to find some incredibly huge plot hole that renders the entire movie a waste of your time? Wild Things actually delivers, in my opinion setting a standard for being one the best of this type of movie (and certainly the best in the last 10 years or so). Some of the acting gets a little wooden, but it’s more than compensated for by the rapidly unfolding and novel plot.

Hitchcockian with tan boobs would be the short review. If you haven’t purchased the original edition, then get this one instead. I own both, and have no regrets on either.

Wild Things is a bit of an odd one really, as there’s no easy way to define it – it’s got sex, corruption, murder, comedy, camp value – but there is one word which sums it up nicely. Entertaining. The story is hilariously over the top, with double cross after double cross and sudden sharp turns in the plot, but it’s not meant to be taken seriously. The real star is Bill Murray, who plays it deadpan (as normal) as a shyster lawyer and nearly steals the show. It really is great fun, and any film that has Denise Richards naked can’t be all bad. The commentary is genial enough (although during the threesome scene they all sound like naughty schoolboys who are watching a porno…), but don’t be enticed by the ‘Deleted Scenes’ – only one is of any substance, and I’d guess they last about two minutes. Don’t know why they bothered. By the way, DO NOT watch the trailer before the film, it gives away the first plot twist of the movie which is never helpful. Definitely worth buying, but don’t expect Shakespeare, because this is just meant to be glossy entertainment and it passes that test with flying colours. With enough surprises to put The Usual Suspects to shame, this is a great film which deserves your full attention.

Last House On The Left (1972) Streaming

November 7th, 2009 by evelyn6780872

Last House On The Left (1972) Streaming

Last House On The Left (1972) Streaming

Download & Watch Last House On The Left (1972) at Amazon.com.

Click Here Now to Download & Watch Last House On The Left (1972) Online Now!

THE LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT is Wes Craven’s startling debut as a no holds barred horror director. Unflinching in its depiction of torture, rape, and humiliation it can still make audiences gasp almost thirty years after its initial release. This tale of two young girls on their way to a concert and their misfortunate run in with four dangerous fugitives is essential viewing for any fan of the Horror genre. What really disturbed me in this film is the way the four villains had so much fun in demeaning and then killing the two girls. And how very close help was… Little Craven-esque quirks tended to pop up (such as a sudden shift from extreme violence to a scene of almost slapstick humor) that will remind viewers of the Elm Street and Scream series. As well as one of the killers names being “Krug” add an “er” and well, you figure it out. Keep a look out for the mother’s scene of revenge down by the lake, that alone is worth the price of admission. Truly deserving of “cult” status!

I don’t think I’ve ever seen a film that has as many titles as The Last House on the Left (1972)…let’s see…it was also known as Grim Company, Krug & Company, Krug and Company (see how they replaced the `&’ with `and’?), Last House on the Left (they left the `The’ part off here…I know, a minor distinction), Night of Vengeance, and Sex Crime of the Century, both of these last two being working titles…it’s funny as almost any of these other titles would have been more applicable, but there you go…produced by Sean S. Cunningham (Friday the 13th), written and directed by horror maven Wes Craven (I’m a poet and didn’t know it), the man behind the popular Nightmare on Elm Street and Scream films, the film features Sandra Cassel (The Filthiest Show in Town), Lucy Grantham, David Hess (Swamp Thing), Fred J. Lincoln (who has since gone on to the wonderful world of adult films as not only and actor but also as a director…you may remember him from the film Edward Penishands 3), Jeramie Rain (The Abductors), Marc Sheffler, Gaylord St. James (Deadly Weapons), Cynthia Carr, Marshall Anker (Shamus), and character actor Martin Kove, who many probably most will recognize as the very nasty and uptight Cobra Kai Sensei John Kreese from the film The Karate Kid (1984).

The film starts off with a shower scene, and we get a nice shot of Sandra Cassel’s jubblies. She plays the character of Mari, and we soon find out she’s going out with a friend, Phyllis (Grantham), to see a concert featuring a band called Bloodlust. Her parents, played by Gaylord St. James and Cynthia Carr, are concerned, but she has just turned 17, and you can’t keep them on the farm forever. Anyway, as the girls drive into the city, we hear a news broadcast on the radio, going into great detail, about a couple of very nasty criminals who’ve recently escaped, and are the focal point for a statewide manhunt, along with their two accomplices. We then cut to a seedy apartment where we get to meet these lovely individuals, obviously all New Yorkers given their accents, featuring Krug (Hess), who appears to be the leader, Fred ‘Weasel’ Podowski (Lincoln), who looks like the illegitimate love child of Joe Pesci and Arnold Horshack, Krug’s son Junior (Sheffler), who definitely looks like Arnold Horshack, and finally the group floozie Sadie (Rain). Okay, so now the girls are in the city, and they approach Junior, who just happens to be standing outside, for some wacky tobaccy, to which he lures them up to the apartment (Sadie couldn’t handle the three of them I guess so they decided to recruit some fresh meat), and thus begins the defilement. The following day the group decides to leave the city (too much heat) and they toss the girls in the trunk. Their car eventually breaks down out in the country near familiar surroundings, and more defilement takes place in the woods. Eventually retribution comes, and in some very unique forms…

I’ve heard much over the years about this film, and while it does possess some fairly intense material, I’ve seen worse (check out some early 80’s Italian horror films and you’ll see what I mean). Some have stated the film has a documentary feel, but I would disagree…it felt more to me like a no frills, low-budget 70’s film with a lot of bad music (you can thank Hess, the actor who played Krug, as he responsible for most of the score, which ranged from weird hippy music to upbeat pianny music…and who was responsible for the audio mixing? The volume on the music was much too high, often overpowering the dialog). There are a number of harsh and brutally graphic scenes, but then this is offset by scenes of what I think are supposed to be of a comic nature featuring the local sheriff and his deputy (played by Kove), showcasing their complete ineptitude as law enforcement officials. I think the non-comedic scenes were handled well, as Craven infuses a strong sense of tension, the kind where you want to look away but can’t, finally assaulting you with a good deal of the ultra-violence, taking it where few, if any, had gone before at the time, featuring some of the most realistic blood I’ve seen in a film in a long time. As far as performances go, they were decent, but I felt the guy who played Krug had much more presence than anyone else in the film, and rightfully so as he was the main antagonist. The final act featuring the retribution scenes was odd to me as it seemed unlikely that the characters would have the presence of mind to go to the trouble setting things up the way they did, especially given the circumstances involved (if you’ve seen the film, you probably understand what I mean, but I don’t want to give away any more than I already have), but that’s not to say I didn’t enjoy it as it provided a suitable outlet given the grotesque nature of the crimes committed by the despicable foursome. I think it’s important to note that if you have delicate sensibilities, you should probably avoid this film as it does have a couple of particularly nasty scenes, one involving a disemboweling and another involving a rape. All in all a powerful film with some really weird musical choices.

There’s a short introduction available featuring Wes Craven, and he basically says this is the most complete version of the film available. The DVD features both the fullscreen and widescreen anamorphic formats (presented in 1.85:1 aspect ratio, enhanced for 16 X 9 TVs) and has decent audio in English mono. There are a number of extras available including a commentary track by writer/director Craven and producer Cunningham, Outtakes and Dailies (14 minutes), Forbidden Footage featurette (8 minutes), It’s Only a Movie featurette (28 minutes), and a theatrical trailer for the film.

Cookieman108

It’s not so much the scenes of horrific violence in themselves that make one wince here (after all, presumably one has signed on for a hardcore violent thriller when ponying up to rent or buy this infamous title), but it’s the frequent juxtaposition of disturbing violence with slapstick comedy that is the really unsettling thing. It’s really strange, for example, to see a violent rape & assault immediately followed by a scene of two cops having to hitch a ride on a chicken truck, and (as if that weren’t enough) a few seconds later watch the cops fall off the truck when it stops too fast. Very weird. Also, the curious among you should be aware that this film isn’t nearly as polished or professional looking as the slick box art might lead you to believe. In other words, if you have no tolerance or appreciation for on-the-fly, low-budget guerilla film-making, avoid this at all costs. I DO have a certain affection for this type of film-making, and even I said “whoa, what were they thinking??” and “Wow, that’s really cheap looking (or sounding)” several times during the course of this. Ultimately, however, I have to say that the movie is worth a look, but it’s probably worth a look more because it’s an interesting bit of movie history than because it’s actually a good movie.

Watch Touched Movie Online

November 7th, 2009 by evelyn6780872

Watch Touched Movie Online

Watch Touched Movie Online

Download & Watch Touched at Amazon.com.

Click Here Now to Download & Watch Touched Online Now!

Okay, I admit it, ‘Touched’ released in ‘05 plays like a Hallmark classic even though it isn’t. It is unquestionably a chick flick so be forwarned. Just remember, fair is fair, guys have to give in once in a while and watch something our wives or girlfriends want to see. Fortunately it does star the very attractive Jenna Elfman and I can’t think of any male who doesn’t like her.

Plot: Recently separated Father and son are hit by an oncoming car. The son dies and the Father (Randall Batinkoff) falls into a coma for the next two years. Nurse Angela Martin (Jenna Elfman) takes care of him during that time until he unexpectedly awakens. OK, we all know the basic storyline from here on, don’t we?

Anyway good production values, attractive cast and just a good film all around. Make your wife or girlfriend happy and give it a shot, the women will absolutely adore Randall Batinkoff and the rest of us can appreciate Jenna. So be tough, suck it up and be a man. If you run into any problems during the viewing follow these simple instructions: One, Two, Three, Breathe – One, Two, Three, Breathe – One, Two…

Sure, there’s some Hollywood-ness to this movie. The whole waking-up-from-a-coma topic is improbable at best, but it’s also of a theme that all of us hope and dream for, and presented quite effectively by a very attractive cast. Nice chemistry between Elfman and Batinkoff, too.

My boyfriend was in a horrendous accident and in a coma for 3 days before awakening, not nearly so dramatically as portrayed in this movie, but just as emotionally, so I have a certain affinity for what these characters go through.

It’s a lovely and well meaning little movie with flawed and imperfect characters and a message of love and hope.

This is a truly bad movie, and only rates two stars because Jenna Elfman is, admittedly, adorable. The characters are one-dimensional, the medical events completely implausible, and the action painfully slow. I hope I am not disclosing too much by stating that those who remember “ET” will find themselves wondering if there are grounds for a lawsuit……

The premise of the movie is not a bad one, nor are the actors, and with better writing and editing, it could have been half decent. I feel sorry for the actors. As they watched the final outcome, they must have cringed.